How do you consistently fail to understand your user base so badly?
— Greg (@gwiss) September 26, 2017
Noooo, bad idea. Twitter it's about creativity and find the way to express in a short message, easy and quick to read. This is not Facebook!
— León Lecanda (@Leonlec) September 26, 2017
twitter: what do people want?
— «ugh.» (@vivalaparrilla) September 27, 2017
people: edit button, save gif, did I mention edit button
twitter: k gonna give them what they want #twitter280 pic.twitter.com/fK8LueJ0F8
everyone who has the extended character limit right now #twitter280 pic.twitter.com/2Qmj6j2Lon
— rob crypt (@robcryptx) September 27, 2017
Users: We want the ability to edit tweets.@Twitter: Okay, we’ll double the amount of available characters so you can make even more typos. https://t.co/aR7RbtphY3
— not Jony Ive (@JonyIveParody) September 26, 2017
NO!!!!!! The beauty of @Twitter is fitting sense (and nonsense) into that character space. Don't mess up the core beauty of the app 😩😩😩😩
— Denzel Mwiyeretsi (@DenzelUG) September 26, 2017
You mean like Trump's clarity of thought and language?
— Cryptoberg (@ultravivo) September 26, 2017
Just because of Trump, it should remain at 140. He's creating enough damage with just 140. Imagine arming him with 280. :-P
— Bora Bali (@borabali) September 27, 2017
This is a small change, but a big move for us. 140 was an arbitrary choice based on the 160 character SMS limit. Proud of how thoughtful the team has been in solving a real problem people have when trying to tweet. And at the same time maintaining our brevity, speed, and essence! https://t.co/TuHj51MsTu
— jack (@jack) September 26, 2017
139 characters pic.twitter.com/WkfdXL8oLh
— Caitlin Kelly (@caitlin__kelly) September 26, 2017
fixed it for you pic.twitter.com/HtXsDxIrri
— eric nusbaum (@ericnus) September 26, 2017
Comments
Leave a Comment